Peter Martin

  • Home
  • About Peter
  • The Conversation
  • The Economists
  • Columns
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Engagements

Sunday, February 01, 2009

"Trickle Down" - John Quiggin's latest refuted doctrine


Here it is.

The earlier ones have been:

Refuted economic doctrines #1: The efficient markets hypothesis

Refuted economic doctrines #2: The case for privatisation

Refuted economic doctrines #3: The Great Moderation

Refuted economic doctrines #4: Individual retirement accounts

I hope there are more.
Labels: financial system, income distribution
Newer Post Older Post Home

Peter Martin, The Conversation

Peter Martin, The Conversation
For mine one of the best economic journalists in the country - Bernard Keane

The best economics correspondent - Ross Gittins

At least he is consistent, consistently wrong - Jamie Briggs

Peter is Business and Economy Editor at The Conversation. A former economics editor of The Age and economics correspondent for ABC radio, he co-hosts The Economists on ABC RN.
Twitter: @1petermartin

Top Columns (Random)

Briefings

  • The Conversation
  • The Conversation Business
  • Australian Financial Review
  • The Australian Economics
  • ABC News Business
  • Fairfax BusinessDay
  • Fairfax Markets Live
  • Financial Times Alphaville
  • Guardian Australia
  • The Saturday Paper
  • The Melbourne Age
  • Sydney Morning Herald

Commentators

  • Tim Colebatch
  • Adam Creighton
  • Greg Jericho
  • Michael Pascoe
  • Shane Wright
  • Ross Gittins
  • Jessica Irvine
  • Terry McCrann
  • John Menadue
  • Nicholas Gruen
  • John Quiggin
  • Bill Mitchell
  • Paul Krugman

Resources

  • Commonwealth Budget
  • Commonwealth Treasury
  • Treasury Research
  • Parliamentary Budget Office
  • Productivity Commission
  • Bureau of Statistics
  • Reserve Bank
  • Labor Policies
  • Coalition Policies
  • Greens Policies
  • Parliamentary Library
  • Open Australia Hansard
  • Political Donations
  • Data.Gov.Au
  • ASX Rate Tracker
  • Henry Tax Review

contact

  • Twitter: @1petermartin
  • Facebook: petermartineconomics
  • Email: petermartineconomics at gmail.com
  • About Peter

archives

  • ►  2019 (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2018 (65)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2017 (109)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2016 (138)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2015 (156)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2014 (92)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2013 (183)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2012 (340)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (40)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2011 (475)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (45)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (44)
    • ►  June (43)
    • ►  May (41)
    • ►  April (33)
    • ►  March (46)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (36)
  • ►  2010 (685)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (51)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (57)
    • ►  August (76)
    • ►  July (48)
    • ►  June (51)
    • ►  May (78)
    • ►  April (55)
    • ►  March (66)
    • ►  February (57)
    • ►  January (65)
  • ▼  2009 (678)
    • ►  December (50)
    • ►  November (59)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (59)
    • ►  August (58)
    • ►  July (73)
    • ►  June (68)
    • ►  May (58)
    • ►  April (58)
    • ►  March (54)
    • ▼  February (60)
      • SATURDAY INSIGHT: Tanner on governing
      • TAXING TIMES: Why Henry will cut the corporate ta...
      • Recession? You’re standing in it!
      • The Systemic Failure of Economics
      • From the ANZ's preview of the week ahead
      • Want to get people to save?
      • A lower company tax rate? Swan wants it.
      • We've had tax cuts, right? Right?
      • Why not axe dividend imputation? Henry gets serio...
      • Sometimes Question Time works well
      • Ideas for getting the world) banking system workin...
      • Just about the strangest letter,
      • Hockey - the carbon target is too low
      • Joe Hockey - where angels fear to tread
      • Good times could be just around the corner. Reall...
      • Governor Glenn Stevens is being grilled by the Hou...
      • $8.7 billion? Let's pay down our cards
      • We're dining at home
      • Reserve Bank: Could this really be the end?
      • So, what's this Joe fellow like?
      • I was wrong - Andrew Robb has company
      • What if Joe Hockey is Julie Bishop in new clothes?...
      • Land of the shrinking sun
      • It's Joe Hockey!
      • Bishopwatch - She's stepped aside
      • Bishopwatch: She's called a press conference in th...
      • Bishopwatch - the end game
      • Xenophon says yes. Government gives concessions
      • Just when it looked as stiumulus packages could ac...
      • Get Crikey! Cheap.
      • IT'S FAILED! The Senate has just rejected the stim...
      • Should China Inc be allowed to control Australia's...
      • REALITY CHECK: Tax cuts are more effective?
      • Is consumer confidence responding?
      • So why does the Treasury believe we'll spend our c...
      • "Malcolm Turnbull's opposition to the $42 billion ...
      • The Senate's verdict? I think they'll pass it
      • Let's call a stimulus snob a snob
      • Australia's tax cuts versus government spending de...
      • Answers from Treasury
      • Our jobs outlook is deteriorating, but we're not t...
      • The edges of other catastrophes
      • Edge of catastrophe?
      • But he was right!
      • "When was the last time the Liberals in national o...
      • The birth of a stimulus package
      • Recession without the 'R' word
      • Vindication for Julie Bishop
      • How significant are these payments?
      • REALITY CHECK: "It's the children I'm thinking abo...
      • Stimulus packages stimulate spending
      • Bloody hell! Turnbull's stand:
      • Big, Responsible, Gutless
      • Sure rates are low, but don't fix - they'll get lo...
      • TUESDAY COLUMN: It's a Budget, not a package
      • Why this board will cut 1.00 percentage points tom...
      • "Trickle Down" - John Quiggin's latest refuted doc...
      • "Why targeted spending and concessions are prefera...
      • Julie Bishop "explains" herself
      • Julie Bishop is at it again!
    • ►  January (34)
  • ►  2008 (571)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (75)
    • ►  October (57)
    • ►  September (66)
    • ►  August (42)
    • ►  July (43)
    • ►  June (43)
    • ►  May (40)
    • ►  April (45)
    • ►  March (41)
    • ►  February (48)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2007 (403)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (59)
    • ►  October (63)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (31)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (34)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2006 (72)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2005 (15)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2004 (26)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2003 (12)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2002 (21)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)

subscribe via rss

  • Peter Martin
  • Columns
Powered by Blogger.