The commentariat
Megalogenis: "Zero is the new black for the Australian economy. The Rudd Government is throwing every dollar it can to keep a plus sign in front of gross domestic product in this financial year and the next. Even a growth rate of zero-point-something, which is the statistical equivalent of standing still for Australia’s $1.1 trillion economy... The kitchen-sink fiscal policy, when combined with much lower interest rates, might work."
Maiden: "The economy is now on a potent drip-feed, comprising fiscal stimulus worth more than 5% of gross domestic product (much of it temporary, which is a good thing), interest rates that are at generational lows, tax cuts that have added another $7 billion to spending power, and a currency that has fallen in value by 35% since mid-2007. So don't believe the doom-laden hype: much depends on China's progress in the next few months."
Gittins: "Worrying about the budget going into deficit is like being told a friend has been killed in a car crash and then inquiring about the fate of the car. At such times there are more important things to worry about."
And: "All this and the recession hasn't really started yet. At 4.5 per cent, unemployment is still at boom-time lows. If the central bankers and politicians are being so uncharacteristically generous, you could reason, they must know something pretty terrible is on the way."
Gans: "Despite appearances, the stimulus is strikingly economically conservative. Ignoring those one-off investments, the Government has not created a structural deficit. Structural deficits are hard to get rid of. In contrast, one-off items can be paid back over time and the pain smoothed accordingly."
Quiggin: "It’s great building schools, but we need to be hiring teachers, teachers aides and support staff to work in them. Human services are the most labor-intensive areas of the economy, and also an area that’s been constrained in the era of economic liberalism that is now coming to an end."
Colebatch: "There is nothing to help the real victims of the recession: the 800,000 Australians whom Treasury expects to be unemployed by June next year.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, apostle of economic morality, has overlooked one basic fact — recessions make most people better off. Our mortgage bills plummet, our taxes are cut, and as inflation sinks, our wages rise faster than the prices we pay. Most of the $16.6 billion he shovelled out yesterday in handouts will go to people who will end this recession better off than ever. We might spend it, we might save it, but we don't need it.
Those who need it are the poor people who bear the cost of the recession on behalf of the rest of us: workers who lose their jobs, apprentices laid off, youngsters who can't even get into the labour market, and businesses and self-employed people who go broke. There is nothing in this package for them. Australia pays its unemployed a starvation wage of $224.65 a week. Its real value has not risen for 20 years or so.
Perhaps Rudd's next essay for The Monthly could be on the morality of kicking the victims."
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Poor Ross Gittins doesn't understand that Keynes advocated counter-cyclical fiscal policies.
This means only stimulate when there is sufficient slack in the labour market.
All this stimulus will do is enhance the boom effects (as happened in 2001 in the US) and create a bigger bust when it arrives.
It will also broaden the divide between rich and poor, as Colebatch has outlined.
A hasty reaction by a timid government.
The news from OS is horrible and it doesn't look like we are going to dodge this bullet.
A year ago we where talking about bottlenecks in out ports/roads and underperformace of our schools and hospitals, these things haven't gone away and now would be a good time to get on with fixing them(and plenty of other issues) instead of handing out huge sums of cash
Really? The news of WMDs was scary, and a few nations invaded another country. The prospect of being overrun by 'illegal immigrants' was scary, so we locked up asylum seekers.
Why does policy have to made as hasty overreactions to crises? Where is the benefit in this for people who will really suffer - those who end up unemployed?
We had a huge stimulus package announced only three months ago. Now another one is announced that will barely do anything to contain the worst effects ($40 billion spent to keep 90,000 employed?!)
I am not a fan of the Liberals but using checks and balances is desirable especially given the last decade was run on a platform of panic, scaremongering politics and disaster capitalism.
If anyone believes that employment is still around 4.5% then all they need to do is walk into their local Centrelink office - where the staff are under seige and don't have the resources to cope now. It is clear that unemployment is already out of control and the *official* numbers are rubbish - these stats are just one of the things that need fixing.
Find myself agreeing with TC. The effect of interest rates dropping to about half of last year is equal to about a 20% pay rise. Throw me $950, stick some insulation in the roof,add a tax cut coming up soon, and what is a GFC but a golden opportunity to party like its 1929.
Who is the govt trying to please, certainly not those who will be doing the hard yards.
What about Stephen Kirchner in 'Plan delivers little bang for very big bucks':
"The problem for all governments is that these unfunded fiscal stimulus measures ultimately have to be paid for out of future taxes. An unfunded fiscal stimulus package of $42billion is thus equivalent to announcing a $42billion future tax increase."
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25004488-7583,00.html
Post a Comment