Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Why treat downloaders worse than speeding drivers?

iinet asks the question.

Some quotes from 14-page paper entitled Encouraging Legitimate Use of OnLine Content:

"Authorities regularly equate speeding as a cause of death, injury and major economic loss to the community . In spite of the seriousness of the offence, the graduated penalty structure for speeding never culminates in the total denial of access to transport."

"iiNet does not believe that termination of access for an entire household, or a business, as a result of one individual’s infringement, is ever appropriate or proportional . As with speeding infringements, speed cameras may permit the identification of a vehicle, via its registration plate, but not necessarily the identity of the driver . The owner of the vehicle has the option of accepting a fine, when notified by the appropriate body or, alternatively, can make a declaration to the authorities, identifying the driver for the issue of penalties."

"Infringements can be ranked as minor (say, single instances), major (say multiple instances of different files) or serious (at a commercial level) . Each level having prescribed penalties. Repeat infringements may require further definition – say a minimum period of one week between detections, or examples of sharing multiple files. A scale of fines can be established, relative to the economic loss represented, and demerit points could also be awarded in line with the severity of the infringements."

Here's the full thing:

Encouraging Legitimate Use of OnLine Content

HT: LifeHacker

Related Posts

. Stealing intellectual property is worse than stealing physical property?

. If it happened to Hew, it could happen to you

. What extending the copyright term exterminates