Wednesday, March 21, 2007
The government-owned and built AUSSAT did indeed make life easier for Mr Packer. He was able to network his TV programs more cheaply. AUSSAT lost almost $1 billion and died as an unloved piece of “space junk”.
30 years on his son James Packer is doing it to Labor.
He has convinced its leader Kevin Rudd that Australia is being held back by “antiquated broadband infrastructure”. Labor wants to spend almost $5 billion putting high-speed broadband within reach of 98 per cent of the population.
The Packers wouldn’t be wanting to use taxpayers money to look after their own interests again, would they?
Rupert Murdoch backs them up... He is cited twice in Labor’s new policy document as an authority for the statement that broadband in Australia is a “disgrace”, and that "we are being left behind”.
Communications Minister Helen Coonan might be wiser to their tricks than is Labor.
She said yesterday: “Quite clearly they’ve got a vested commercial interest in selling their content, and they would like to do so on the back of some infrastructure that they don’t have to pay for.”
Labor’s policy document is a credulous one.
Try subjecting this claim, repeated with approval in the Labor document, to the “laugh test”. That is – try reading it out loud without laughing: “Broadband is just as necessary as water and electricity”.
Even if that was true it fails to justify spending $4.7 billion of taxpayers money to speed broadband up. Nine out of ten of us have access to broadband faster than 256 kbps at the moment, and it is being extended to most of the rest of the population.
Who would a public-funded increase in speed to 12 megabits per second benefit?
Labor says it would help small businesses - of a certain sort. It cites “graphic designers, software programmers, and architects transmitting fully rendered 3D models of buildings”. True enough I suppose, but it hardly seems to justify spreading the very high speed to the entire population.
It talks about education (although my eldest daughter seems to get her homework done with the broadband speed she’s got.)
And it talks about the wonders of blogs, youtube and myspace, - all of which are booming with our existing broadband speeds.
It doesn’t talk about the really biggest beneficiaries (except when quoting them and reports they have commissioned as authorities). James Packer, Rupert Murdoch and the Fairfax organisation want high-speed government-provided broadband in order to push television-quality vision into every laptop and PC. They want the government to pay for it.
Earlier this year Professor Joshua Gans of the Melbourne Business School examined high-speed broadband for the Committee for the Economic Development of Australia. He found no case for a government-funded national speed up. After reading Labor’s document last night he stood by that conclusion describing it as “massive overkill”.